Jack Reacher VS John Wick

Avatar image for kaizergenocide
Kaizergenocide

1762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Movie versions of these characters. Morals on.

No Caption Provided

Round 1

Both men equipped with a pistol and an assault riffle with no bullets. Ammunitions scattered around combat area hidden somewhere. Starts at 100ft apart without visual of each other in the area.

Round 2

Both men starts at 20ft apart with no guns. Face to face. Equipped with combat knife and a handcuff.

No Caption Provided

Fight takes place here at 1800HR
Fight takes place here at 1800HR

Win by KO, Death, or Submission.

Who would win and why (or how)?

Avatar image for kaizergenocide
Kaizergenocide

1762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

bump*

Avatar image for usha
Usha

3726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Round 1: Could be Wick. Forgot how good Reacher was with his tactical ability. Wick's reaction speed in the Catacombs in numero 2 was very impressive.

Round 2; Mr. Wick. Just the overall better fighter. More skilled, actually has ground game unlike many other action movie characters.

Avatar image for assemblesquad
assemblesquad

4655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wick stomps. He stomped more skilled foes that Reacher would easily lose to.

Avatar image for ezra_
Ezra_

3655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Reacher's always been more of a Investigator and planner then straight gun fighter.

I don't think he actually tries to kill anyone in his films either.