You don't have to seperate the two. I mean, its very natural for us to do so and ask such questions... but you can also ask yourself why? Why do I ask such questions, where I should question whether I should care for myself as an individual, more than those that are not myself? Both are interesting questions, and in pursuit of both you can learn a lot of interesting ideas from philosophy, science, religion, art, fiction etc
There is a similar philosophical debate some have over selfishness and selflessness, are there any true selfless acts? For examples people given, you can often find, some small tiny loophole, or motivation or sense of benefit of the self behind the act, that can be argued to be self motivated in some way, like ideologically, or ego, or empathy or so on. Then to others, the argument is silly, and gets hung up on the abstract too much. Actions have degrees of selfishness and selflessness and its the arrangement, dynamic and context of the situation that is more important. A person who goes out and does good deeds that benefit others, may have a warm feeling at night as they ready to rest, which could be argued to be a selfish feeling, but its silly to frame it such, or them as selfish and therefore such acts not more ideal than someone who spends each day making others lives worse.
If you have a best friend, best friends, an exclusive romantic sexual partner, parents, brothers and sisters, children, the line gets really blurry about how much you care about them versus how much you care about yourself. Even more complicated and blurry when you consider they will have those connections beyond just you as well.
Many people often care more about others than they care about themselves, but... even then, usually, that care they have for others, still reflects personal necessity, concern, importance, desire, so on. Oh and then imagine this? Imagine having a daughter or girlfriend that really really cares about you... but they are clinically depressed and not really feeling up to caring for themselves... so... you want them to care about themselves as much as they care about you...
Then more specifically towards OP, you can be a push over without caring about others. Caring about others doesn't make or mean you are a push over, depends on the context. Did you care about people by visiting homeless and talking to them about their issues? Volunteering at a domestic abuse shelter and putting yourself to physically protect vulnerable from abusers as an act of deterrence? Protested with people in acts of unity and support for the benefit of others? None of that would sound like a push over... However some people equate caring about others a different way, which is more about the reward of being passive, but then not being granted that reward or reimbursement... and that could potentially veer into being a push over... but it also doesn't really sound like helping people, not of your own agency anyway.
TL;DR, there are no dumb questions, but some questions are poorly constructed because as humans we tend to categorise abstract ideas around the self, and the external notions of others. Its a bit silly, because we are social animals who derive immense amounts of joy, validation, comfort and pleasure from each other, viewing yourself in a vacuum or not realising that your satisfaction is often tied to others. Its like asking, should you want your eyesight or mobility from legs more? Well both really, take both, care about yourself and care about others, care about others for yourself, and for yourself care about others (and hope that others care about you near as much as they care about themselves and that the ones you do care about, care about themselves as much as they care about you)
Log in to comment