@rbt: Good point, the almost 200,000 people who voted on Civil Ware are less representative than 20,000 tweeting.
I mean its kinda hard to give my 100% to your drivel.
Don't worry RBT, I feel completely the same
@petey_is_spidey.
Snyder fans aren't going to single-handily cause a hashtag to trend for over a day with 100,000 tweets, so you're point is utterly idiotic.
So who else is tweeting #releasethesnydercut cuz I'll tell you, the average person doesn't know what the hell a Snyder is much less a Snyder cut.
And Rotten Tomatoes??? LMAO, you mean the website that allows basically anyone to vote, irregardless of whether or not they've seen the movie?
I don't think 200,000 people are wasting their time voting without having seen a movie. Like I would never do that and would never assume other people would. Do you do that or something? Anyway yeah I'd argue that the fact that Civil War got almost double the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes than the Snyder cut got tweets while trending despite the fact rotten tomatoes is a much smaller platform probably says something, good point on the difference in size.
Justice League get's more engagement than Civil War and Jurassic World 2, two vastly more popular films that made significantly more money.
I'm sure Justice League, the movie that bombed horribly and got beaten by the third Thor movie which had half it's budget, is in fact secretly more popular that Captain America: Civil War that made over a billion dollars. That does in fact make sense
You think your average Joe off the street immediately went home and dug into all the easter eggs and Endgame lore after watching the movie?
I didn't, but the average Joe also saw Endgame more than once while the average Joe has probably not seen Justice League at all, so I don't see your point.
Like where are you at that you're basically making conspiracy theories about people secretly liking the same movies you do.
Log in to comment